CAUTION: Do Not Feed the Pedophiles

NON-FICTION / 2022 / IN-PROGRESS 

The laws are designed to silence victims of sexual abuse and domestic violence -- and even exploit couples going through the divorce process. Before you even consider moving to Arizona, or dissolving a marriage with young children anywhere in the country, you must first read this book. To the wicked, your children are the new hot commodity!

LIGHTSHINE INDUSTRIES shines the light on recent case studies, data gathered from focus groups, news reports, traps set up in legislature, court watcher accounts, corruption among mental health professionals and legal cartels, radical religious adoption mills, testimonies by  prominent statesmen, and raw stories from real victims -- to show you how kids are being sourced for the evil-minded under the false image of righteousness. On behalf of concerned parents everywhere, and the thousands of children being sold to anxious buyers each month, this investigative report on the dark world of child trafficking was created to draw public attention to the urgent need for elected officials to make quick and sensible changes to current "legal scripture" in order to protect our children from those manipulating the system to appease private interests.

COURT-INFLICTED HARMS TO CHILDREN
  • How do custody evaluations and psychological assessments by state-selected mental health professionals with criminal histories or active DUIs -- serve a child's best interests?
  • If couples seeking divorce enter a courtroom already broken, then why is the system designed only to break them even more -- financially, spiritually, physically, and mentally? 
  • How are state-appointed lawyers and mental health professionals selected? And can they be punished by the same hand that first hired them -- after atrocities have already been committed? 
  • Who checks for possible conflicts of interest in a courtroom before heavy investments and damages are made? What if old ties are discovered after severe bleeding has already occurred? Who do you sue?
  •  If economic and emotional stability are vital to a child's mental and physical well-being, then why are custody battles so disorganized, erratic and so drawn-out -- creating many unnecessary time delays and expenses? How can any child evolve and prosper under such an unstable 'stop and go' lifestyle? 
  • How can a parent plan anything, keep a job, or seek a new salary position with so many disruptions to their schedule, bank account, and personal freedoms? 
  • Why are courts ordering financially burdensome evaluations that only deplete a percentage of a family’s financial resources, especially at a time when funds are already being drained by the formal reorganization of the family? How do these financial assaults serve a child’s best interests? 
  • What can a parent do when they are confronted by a biased judge with provable memory problems? What about an unethical attorney who has taken command of the court by exploiting the disability and/or material weaknesses of a judge? Do judicial committees offer reimbursements? And why are court watchers not automatically hired by counties in every state to make sure the law is always working?
  •  If the kidnapping and trafficking of children for sexual exploitation is a well-recognized epidemic in Arizona, then why do current lawmakers turn away parents with legitimate screams and grievances? Are they in on it? And if not, then why are current laws designed to punish and silence victims who try to come forward about their abuses?
  • If strong communication is the hallmark of any successful organization or family unit, then why are most court-appointed "professionals" unreachable by phone or email? Is this setup to fail -- deliberate? And if these organizations typically have horrendous reviews, and very dysfunctional communication and organizational infrastructures, then why is the state appointing them to evaluate families? Is it to damage them? Or further separate them?
  • If it has been documented that psych evaluations and therapeutic visitations may potentially lead to damaging the children the court is trying to protect, then why do they keep doing them? Does it make sense to place a predator with their victim for shared counseling services? And how can a therapist or judge ever assume that a child was never molested if predators typically do not defile their victims before an audience?
  • And if courts are driving families to bankruptcy with inefficient legislature and widespread corruption, then why not change those in power who do nothing to protect them from being exploited, either financially -- or for their children?

Priorities are determined by values. 

Suzy Kassem

###